Comparison

Tempest vs PuTTY: 30 years apart, compared fairly

PuTTY has earned three decades of trust by doing one thing reliably. Tempest is what an SSH client looks like when it's designed for today's workflow — multiple machines, mixed protocols, files, phones. Here's the honest breakdown of what each buys you.

Free plan available — replacing PuTTY costs nothing to try.

Tempest terminal and file manager, the modern PuTTY workflow

Tempest vs PuTTY

PuTTY 0.83 (official builds) versus Tempest, on the things a working day actually touches.

Tempest PuTTY
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS, Web Windows (official); ports vary
Windows on ARM Native ARM64 build ARM64 build available
Tabs & split screens Yes — grid workspace No — one window per session
SFTP Graphical manager + built-in editor psftp / pscp command line
Profile sync across machines Zero-knowledge E2E encrypted No — registry export by hand
Jump hosts Point-and-click chains Manual ProxyCommand / plink
Port forwarding Saved rules per profile Yes, configured per session
Serial & Telnet Yes Yes
Mosh Yes No
RDP / VNC / Kubernetes / RCON Yes No
Mobile apps Android & iOS, synced None
Hardware keys (FIDO2) Yes Via Pageant + external tools
AI assistance Built-in reviewed agent None
Price Free plan; Pro subscription or lifetime Free (MIT)

PuTTY remains free, open-source, and tiny — real advantages Tempest doesn't pretend to match. The question is what your time spent working around it is worth.

The case for switching

PuTTY's gaps are your daily chores

Every PuTTY workflow eventually grows a WinSCP window, a notepad of hostnames, a plink script for the bastion, and a prayer when you switch PCs. Tempest deletes that scaffolding.

Terminal + SFTP editor in one window — the WinSCP tab is built in. SFTP docs
Profiles sync encrypted; a new PC is sign-in, not setup. How E2EE works
Bastion chains and forwarding rules saved per host. Jump host guide
The session follows you to Android and iOS.
One Tempest window replacing several PuTTY-era tools

The case for staying

When PuTTY is honestly enough

One Windows machine, a handful of hosts, no file transfers, an environment where installing software is a battle — PuTTY's single 1 MB executable is unbeatable there, and we're not going to pretend otherwise.

PuTTY is open-source, auditable, and runs from a USB stick.
Tempest's free plan is the fair test: if it doesn't save you time in a week, keep PuTTY.

Migration

Bring your keys, leave the registry

Convert .ppk keys to OpenSSH format with PuTTYgen, import, recreate your hosts once — they sync everywhere from then on. Credentials live zero-knowledge encrypted, not in HKEY_CURRENT_USER.

PuTTYgen exports OpenSSH-format keys Tempest imports directly.
Serial and Telnet sessions carry over as saved profiles too. Serial guide
YubiKey/FIDO2 replaces the Pageant juggling. YubiKey setup

Frequently asked questions

Is Tempest free like PuTTY?
The free plan is free forever — SSH, Mosh, SFTP, FTP, S3, WebDAV — which already covers more than PuTTY plus psftp. Pro (subscription or one-time lifetime) adds RDP, VNC, Kubernetes, serial, RCON, unlimited sync, and the AI agent.
Is PuTTY still safe to use?
Yes — PuTTY is actively maintained and trustworthy. This comparison is about workflow cost, not security FUD: modern auth (FIDO2, post-quantum KEX) and encrypted sync are simply easier in Tempest.
Can Tempest open .ppk key files?
Convert .ppk to OpenSSH format in PuTTYgen (Conversions → Export OpenSSH key) and import — a one-time step per key.
Does Tempest work offline like PuTTY?
Yes — direct connections work without an account or network beyond the target; the account only powers encrypted sync and team features.
What replaces plink in scripts?
Tempest focuses on interactive workflows. For scripted automation, keep OpenSSH or plink in your scripts, and use Tempest snippets and scheduled runs for the recurring interactive chores. Snippets & scheduled runs

Respect the classic. Retire the workflow.